ARE YOU PAYING TOO MUCH?
You could save as much as 30% of the premiums you pay on risk life assurance – against early death, for example – by, in effect, changing your policy from one paying out a single large lump sum and priced for the maximum term, such as “whole of life”, to one covering each of your financial needs with a precisely matched duration of cover.
BrightRock, a comparatively new kid on the risk life assurance block, has made this claim.
It says that, as a result of the traditional “lump-sum” structure, your cover becomes increasingly unaffordable, resulting in your reducing or cancelling it in later years. Having paid from day one for the cover, you then sacrifice it at the very time you need it most.
And when you reach the stage where your cover becomes unaffordable, you may not be able to obtain more affordable cover, because you may have developed a health condition that makes you either uninsurable or that necessitates exclusions and/or premium loadings on your policy.
The BrightRock claim follows the publication last year of research undertaken by True South Actuaries & Consultants, on behalf of BrightRock, which showed that many people who bought seemingly “cheap” life assurance when they were younger faced losing their cover as their premiums escalated above the inflation rate and became increasing unaffordable.
WHAT TO AVOID
Schalk Malan, executive director at BrightRock, says there is a triple whammy for policyholders in the way most risk assurance premiums are calculated. The three big drawbacks are:
1. Low initial premiums: To attract new business in an increasingly competitive market, life assurance companies offer seemingly cheap premiums when you are young and unlikely to claim. But as you grow older and become more likely to claim, your premiums escalate rapidly.